Out Patenting the Patent Trolls

July 1st, 2008 by Justin Ryan

Your rating: None

The latest effort to outwit the spate of sham companies extorting patent royalties is a group effort to cross the bridge before the trolls can get there.

The move, headed up by Google and bringing together big names including Verizon, Cisco, and HP, involves the creation of a holding company, christened the Churchill-esque Allied Security Trust, which will snatch up key patents and hold them in common to keep them out of the hands — and legal actions — of royalty-hungry patent trolls. Each company is putting up $250,000 to join, and escrowing a whopping $5 million to provide a slush fund for patent purchases. Good news for the good guys, but something tells us this won't be the end of the greed brigade.

__________________________
Justin Ryan is News Editor for LinuxJournal.com.
Submit a tip: EmailIRC


Special Magazine Offer -- 2 Free Trial Issues!
Receive 2 free trial issues of Linux Journal as well as instant online access to current and past issues. There's NO RISK and NO OBLIGATION to buy. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Sorry, offer available in the US only. International orders, click here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture

I don't care for the legalese...

On July 1st, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:

From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause):

Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, known as the Copyright Clause, the Copyright and Patent Clause (or Patent and Copyright Clause), the Intellectual Property Clause and the Progressive Clause, empowers the United States Congress:
“ To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

The clause starts with its intention: to promote the progress, etc., etc.

Current patent/copyright/trademark laws are getting in the way of progress. So, they seem to be unconstitutional, to begin with.

Reform the laws (fat chance!), respect the Constitution, and things should work as intended.

Do I believe this will happen? Not in my lifetime...

Post new comment

Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Featured Videos

The November 13, 2008 edition of Linux Journal Live! Shawn Powers and special guest, Linux Journal Author Daniel Bartholomew, talk e-book readers and Daniel's Kindle, DRM, and other goodness.

From the Magazine

December 2008, #176

The Oxford English Dictionary says the word "gadget" is a placeholder name for a technical item whose precise name one can't remember. Like that book-reader thingy from Amazon...what's it called? Spindle, Gindle...Kindle, that's it. Check it out in this month's gadget issue.

Other gadgets covered include the Nokia tablets, the BlackBerry, the Neo FreeRunner, the Dash Express, the Roku Netflix Player, the Kangaroo TV, The TomTom GO 930 and the MooBella Ice Cream System. On the larger hardware front, read the reviews of the Acer Aspire One and the YDL PowerStation. On the software front, check out the articles and columns on memcached, Samba security, Mutt, desktop gadgets, bash and Puppet. To wrap it all up, read Doc's thoughts on Google and the browser platform.

Read this issue

Sign up for our Email Newsletter